Health economists often use log models to deal with skewed outcomes, such a
s health utilization or health expenditures. The literature provides a numb
er of alternative estimation approaches for log models, including ordinary
least-squares on In(y) and generalized linear models. This study examines h
ow well the alternative estimators behave econometrically in terms of bias
and precision when the data are skewed or have other common data problems (
heteroscedasticity, heavy tails, etc.). No single alternative is best under
all conditions examined. The paper provides a straightforward algorithm fo
r choosing among the alternative estimators. Even if the estimators conside
red are consistent, there can be major losses in precision from selecting a
less appropriate estimator. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights rese
rved.