Prediction of blood pressure level and need for antihypertensive medication: 10 years of follow-up

Citation
Jm. Jokiniitty et al., Prediction of blood pressure level and need for antihypertensive medication: 10 years of follow-up, J HYPERTENS, 19(7), 2001, pp. 1193-1201
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
ISSN journal
02636352 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1193 - 1201
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-6352(200107)19:7<1193:POBPLA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the usefulness of blood pressure and its variability in the prediction of future blood pressure and need for antihypertensive me dication. Methods We used WHO criteria to classify, at baseline, 97 healthy untreated male volunteers as normotensive (n = 34), borderline hypertensive (n = 29) or mild hypertensive (n = 34), with casual measurements before intra-arter ial 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, After 10 years of follow-up, 87 of the men (90%) were available and their blood pressure was recorded u sing casual measurements and non-invasive ambulatory 24 h monitoring. Results During the follow-up, the blood pressure classification deteriorate d in 35 individuals (40%) and improved in six (7%) (McNemar test, P <0.0001 ). In the borderline hypertensive group, 77% became hypertensive (P=0.03). The 24 h mean systolic blood pressure was the best predictor of follow-up c asual systolic (adj.R-2 = 0.420) and 24 h systolic (adj.R-2 = 0.540) blood pressure. The 24 h mean diastolic blood pressure was the best predictor of follow-up casual diastolic (adj.R-2 = 0.301) and 24 h diastolic (adj.R-2 = 0.292) blood pressure, The baseline casual systolic blood pressure also pre dicted the follow-up casual systolic blood pressure relatively well (adj.R- 2 = 0.356), but was clearly weaker for the follow-up 24 h systolic (adj.R-2 = 0.275) blood pressure. The prediction of follow-up casual diastolic (adj .R-2 = 0.259) and follow-up 24 h diastolic (adj.R-2 = 0.214) blood pressure by baseline casual blood pressure was even weaker. The means and variabili ties of the 24 h, daytime, and night-time blood pressures were the best pre dictors of the need for antihypertensive medication (Cox-Snell R-2 = 0.399) . The characteristics of the individual did not significantly predict futur e blood pressure and the need for antihypertensive medication. Conclusions The 24 h mean blood pressure was an excellent predictor of the future blood pressure and the need for antihypertensive medication. Predict ion of antihypertensive medication was further improved by also using blood pressure variability. Systolic blood pressure was more predictable than di astolic blood (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.