Boards of directors are coming under increasing scrutiny, both in the wake
of a number of serious corporate frauds and failures and through a more gen
eral debate about the nature of corporate governance and its role in achiev
ing national competitiveness. Though research on boards is growing, there r
emains a lack of empirical studies on the perceptions of directors themselv
es as to their role and influence in the running of organizations, and in p
articular the strategic process.
This article responds to widespread calls for direct study of boards of dir
ectors by using a multi-method approach involving an in-depth examination o
f 51 directors of UK public companies, a survey of 121 company secretaries
and four case studies of UK plcs, where multiple hoard members were intervi
ewed. Through the use of a grounded methodology, this article examines the
impact of boards on strategy and shows that by establishing the business de
finition, gatekeeping, selecting directors, and confidence building, the bo
ard influences the boundaries of strategic action. Evidence for the manager
ial domination off boards was slight, but the results showed support for a
number of theoretical frameworks, suggesting that multiple perspectives are
required to fully understand the nature of board activity.