B. Meyer et al., Is stagnating flow in former feeding arteries an indication of cerebral hypoperfusion after resection of arteriovenous malformations?, J NEUROSURG, 95(1), 2001, pp. 36-43
Object. The authors' goal in this study was to challenge the proposed mecha
nism of the occlusive hyperemia theory, in which it is asserted that stagna
ting flow in the former feeding arteries of cerebral arteriovenous malforma
tions (AVMs) leads to parenchymal hypoperfusion or ischemia, from which pos
toperative edema and hemorrhage originate.
Methods. Cortical oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) was measured in 52 patients by
using microspectrophotometry in areas adjacent to AVMs before and after re
section. The appearance of the former feeding arteries was categorized as n
ormal (Group A); moderately stagnating (Group B); and excessively stagnatin
g (Group C) on postoperative angiographic fast-film series. Patients and Sa
O(2) values were pooled accordingly and compared using analysis of variance
and Duncan tests (p < 0.05). Angiographic stagnation times in former feedi
ng arteries were correlated in a linear regression/correlation analysis wit
h SaO(2) data (p < 0.05). All values are given as the mean +/- standard dev
iation.
The average median postoperative SaO(2) in Group C (15 patients) was signif
icantly higher than in Groups B (17 patients) and A (20 patients) (Group C,
75.2 +/- 8.5; Group B, 67.5 +/- 10.8; Group A, 67.1 +/- 12 %SaO(2)), as wa
s the average postoperative increase in SaO(2) (Group C, 25.9 +/- 14.9; Gro
up B, 14.6 +/- 14; Group A, 11.1 +/- 14 %SaO(2)). Angiographically confirme
d stagnation times were also significantly longer in Group C than in Group
B (Group C, 5.6 +/- 2.5; Group B, 1.3 +/- 0.6 seconds). A significant corre
lation/regression analysis showed a clear trend toward higher postoperative
SaO(2) levels with increasing stagnation time.
Conclusions. Stagnating flow in former feeding arteries does not cause cort
ical ischemia, but its presence on angiographic studies is usually indicati
ve of hyperperfusion in the surrounding brain tissue after AVM resection. I
n the context of the pathophysiology of AVMs extrapolations made from angio
graphically visible shunt flow to blood flow in the surrounding brain tissu
e must be regarded with caution.