Jj. Mccarthy et al., Early radiographic differentiation of infantile tibia vara from physiologic bowing using the femoral-tibial ratio, J PED ORTH, 21(4), 2001, pp. 545-548
The authors hypothesized that the ratio of the femoral to tibial metaphysea
l-diaphyseal angles (femoral-tibial ratio [FTR]) more accurately differenti
ates physiologic bowing from infantile tibial vara than the tibial metaphys
eal-diaphyseal angle (TMDA). The purpose of this study was threefold: to de
termine the false-negative and false-positive error rate of the FTR and TMD
A; to determine to the effect of rotation on the FTR and TMDA; and to deter
mine the reliability of the FTR and TMDA measurements. An FTR < 1 resulted
in a false-negative error rate of 10% and a false-positive error rate of 7%
, whereas a TMDA > 13 degrees resulted in a false-negative error rate of 23
% and a false-positive error rate of 10%. The difference between internal a
nd external rotation was not significant for the FTR, whereas it was for th
e TMDA. The FTR was found to have good interobserver and intraobserver reli
ability (0.78 and 0.98, respectively).