Wm. Splinter et al., VOMITING AFTER STRABISMUS SURGERY IN CHILDREN - ONDANSETRON VS PROPOFOL, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 44(8), 1997, pp. 825-829
Purpose: To compare the antiemetic efficacy and costs associated with
two anaesthetic regimens in children undergoing strabismus surgery. On
e regimen contained halothane, nitrous oxide and ondansetron, white th
e other contained propofol and nitrous oxide. Methods: Three hundred c
hildren aged 2-14 yr undergoing strabismus surgery were enrolled into
this single-blind, randomized, stratified, blocked study with a balanc
ed design. Anaesthesia was induced by inhalation with halothane/N2O/O-
2 (Group O) or with 2.5-3.5 mg.kg(-1) propofol + 0.5 mg.kg(-1) lidocai
ne iv (Group P). Group O patients were administered 0.15 mg.kg(-1) ond
ansetron (maximum dose 8 mg) iv and all patients received atropine 20
mu g.kg(-1) iv immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia
was maintained with N2O and halothane (Group O) or N2O and propofol (
Group P). Patients were followed for 24 hr after their operation prima
rily to assess the incidence of postoperative vomiting, For each case,
the costs of the anaesthetic drugs administered and their associated
intravenous administration tubing were determined. Drug costs were tho
se prevailing at the study site at the time of the investigation. Fixe
d costs, such as the cost of the anaesthetic equipment were not assess
ed. Results: Groups were similar with respect to demographic data. The
incidence of vomiting in both groups was 11% while in-hospital and 23
% after discharge. Each episode of in-hospital vomiting prolonged disc
harge by 17+/-4 min, P < 0.001. Mean cost per case for anaesthetic dru
gs was less in Group 0, 18 +/- 8 vs 21 +/- 10 CDN$, mean +/- SD, P < 0
.01. Conclusion: The two methods of antiemetic prophylaxis were equall
y effective. Propofol-based anaesthesia was more expensive.