The history of landscape quality assessment has featured a contest between
expert and perception-based approaches, paralleling a long-standing debate
in the philosophy of aesthetics. The expert approach has dominated in envir
onmental management practice and the perception-based approach has dominate
d in research. Both approaches generally accept that landscape quality deri
ves from an interaction between biophysical features of the landscape and p
erceptual/judgmental processes of the human viewer. The approaches differ i
n the conceptualizations of and the relative importance of the landscape an
d human viewer components. At the close of the 20th century landscape quali
ty assessment practice evolved toward a shaky marriage whereby both expert
and perceptual approaches are applied in parallel and then, in some as yet
unspecified way, merged in the final environmental management decision maki
ng process. The 21st century will feature continued momentum toward ecosyst
em management where the effects of changing spatial and temporal patterns o
f landscape features. at multiple scales and resolutions, will be more impo
rtant than any given set of features at any one place at any one time. Vali
d representation of the visual implications of complex gee-temporal dynamic
s central to ecosystem management will present major challenges to landscap
e quality assessment. Technological developments in geographic information
systems, simulation modeling and environmental data visualization will cont
inue to help meet those challenges. At a more fundamental level traditional
landscape assessment approaches will be challenged by the deep ecology and
green philosophy movements which advocate a strongly bio-centric approach
to landscape quality assessment where neither expert design principles nor
human perceptions and preferences are deemed relevant. On the opposite side
of the landscape-human interaction, social/cultural construction models th
at construe the landscape as the product of socially instructed human inter
pretation leave little or no role for biophysical landscape features and pr
ocesses. A psychophysical approach is advocated to provide a more appropria
te balance between biophysical and human perception/judgement components of
an operationally delimited landscape quality assessment system. (C) 2001 P
ublished by Elsevier Science B.V.