How localized electrons interact with delocalized electrons is a question c
entral to many of the problems at the forefront of solid state physics. The
simplest example, the Kondo effect, occurs when an impurity atom with an u
npaired electron is placed in a metal, and the energy of the unpaired elect
ron is far below the Fermi energy. At low temperatures a spin singlet state
is formed between the unpaired localized electron and delocalized electron
s at the Fermi energy. The consequences of this singlet formation were firs
t observed over 60 years ago in metals with magnetic impurities, but full t
heoretical understanding was slow to come. Today, the situation is reversed
: scaling theories and recent renormalization group calculations (T.A. Cost
i, A.C. Hewson (1994) J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 6, 2519) can predict quantitativ
ely the bonding strength of the singlet state, and the singlet's effect on
the conduction electrons at all temperatures. The detailed dependence of th
ese properties on parameters such as the energy of the localized electron c
annot be tested experimentally in the classic Kondo systems, since the rele
vant parameters cannot easily be tuned for impurities in a metal. Recently
it has become possible to test these predictions with a new experimental ap
proach creating an artificial Kondo system by nanofabrication (D. Goldhaber
-Gordon et al. (1998), Nature 391, 156). The confined droplet of electrons
interacting with the leads of a single electron transistor (SET) is closely
analogous to an impurity atom interacting with the delocalized electrons i
n a metal, as described in the Anderson model (Y. Meir, N.S. Wingreen, P.A.
Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. (1993) 70 2601-2604). We review here measurements on
a new generation of SETs that display all the aspects of the Kondo effect:
the spin singlet forms and causes an enhancement of the zero-bias conducta
nce when the number of electrons on the artificial atom is odd but not when
it is even. The singlet is altered by applying a voltage or magnetic field
or by increasing the temperature, all in ways that agree with predictions
(N.S. Wingreen, Y. Meir (1994), Phys. Rev. B 49, 11040; T.A. Costi, A.C. He
wson (1994), J. Phys.: Cond. Mat. 6, 2519; W. Izumida, O. Sakai, Y. Shimizu
(1998), J. Phys. Sec. Jpn. 67; D. Goldhaber-Gordon et al. (1998), Nature 3
91, 156; D. Goldhaber-Gordon, J. (Gores, M.A. Kastner, H. Shtrikman, D. Mah
alu, U. Meirav (1998), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5225). (C) 2001 Elsevier Scienc
e B.V. All rights reserved.