Purpose: The purpose of this study was a) to compare the effect of three di
fferent warm-up protocols upon rowing performance and perception of dyspnea
, and b) to identify the functional significance of a respiratory warm-up.
Methods: A group of well-trained club rowers (N = 14) performed a 6-min all
-out rowing simulation (Concept II). We examined differences in mean power
output and dyspnea measures (modified CR-Borg scale) under three different
conditions: after a submaximal rowing warm-up (SWU), a specific rowing warm
-up (RWU), and a specific rowing warm-up with the addition of a respiratory
warm-up (RWUplus) protocol. Results: Mean power output during the 6-min al
l-out rowing effort increased by 1.2% after the RWUplus compared with that
obtained after the RWU (P < 0.05) which, in turn, was by 3.2% higher than t
he performance after the SWU (P < 0.01). Similarly, after the RWUplus, dysp
nea was 0.6 +/- 0.1 (P < 0.05) units of the Borg scale lower compared with
the dyspnea after the RWU and 0.8 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.05) units lower than the d
yspnea after the SWU. Conclusion: These data suggest that a combination of
a respiratory warm-up protocol together with a specific rowing warm-up is m
ore effective than a specific rowing warm-up or a submaximal warm-up alone
as a preparation for rowing performance.