A pilot study to assess the viability of a randomised controlled trial of methods of supplementary feeding of breast-fed pre-term babies

Citation
C. Mosley et al., A pilot study to assess the viability of a randomised controlled trial of methods of supplementary feeding of breast-fed pre-term babies, MIDWIFERY, 17(2), 2001, pp. 150-157
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
MIDWIFERY
ISSN journal
02666138 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
150 - 157
Database
ISI
SICI code
0266-6138(200106)17:2<150:APSTAT>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objectives: to compare the impact of two methods of supplementary feeding o f pre-term babies (bottle vs cup) on subsequent breast feeding and to asses s the feasibility of using a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investiga te the topic. Design and Method: small scale prospective RCT. Data on breast feeding, as defined as the exclusive method of feeding, were collected. A range of rele vant bio-data was also collected and their impact on breast feeding assesse d. Setting: a special care baby unit in a District General Hospital in the UK. Participants: over a three-month period, all pre-term babies (32-37 weeks' gestation) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and has been born to mother s who had expressed a prepartum desire to breast feed, who had consented to take part, were included (n=14). Procedure: the eligible babies were randomly allocated to supplementary fee ding of breast milk, via either a cup or a bottle. Whether or not the baby was being breast fed at discharge was noted. Findings: the study suggested that this RCT framework is a viable method of investigating baby feeding. Because of the small-scale nature of the proje ct, the actual database must be treated with extreme caution. No significan t differences were found between the two groups in terms of breast feeding. However, the mothers reported high levels of support and also the breast-f eeding rates were above the national averages. These two findings could hav e contributed to the non-significant results observed in this analysis. Conclusions: if the present findings could be supported by further research , then the nonsignificant results relating method of supplementary feeds to subsequent breast feeding could be explained by reference to three factors , Firstly, there is, in fact, no real effect of method of supplementary fee ding and subsequent breast feeding; secondly, the method adopted differed f rom existing research and thus may be expected to produce non-corroborative results; and finally, the overall levels of breast feeding within the Unit generally were higher than the national average. The relevance of the RCT for investigating this subject is also discussed with reference to the pres ent data set. Further experimental work to develop these ideas and to ident ify causal links is required. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.