Although well known as carnivores and not capable of digesting plant fiber,
grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume over 200 species of plants
and are entirely vegetarian in some ecosystems. Even in ecosystems with ab
undant meat resources, green vegetation can be an important seasonal food r
esource. Therefore, we examined the morphological, physiological, and envir
onmental constraints that determine the nutritional value of herbaceous veg
etation to grizzly bears. Shortterm, board foraging trials were used with c
aptive grizzly bears to determine constraints on intake rate including bite
size, bite rate, bear size, plant species, plant height, and plant distrib
ution. Feeding trials were conducted to determine the effect of protein lev
el (12-35%) and digestible dry matter intake on weight gain. Finally, maxim
um daily intake, daily foraging time, and weight change were measured for c
aptive bears foraging on highly abundant and nutritious forbs and grasses d
uring 12-day trials. Intake during short-term board trials overestimated th
e intake of freely foraging bears from two-to seven-fold depending on bear
size. Because of their relatively larger bite sizes, smaller absolute energ
y requirements, and relatively larger intake capacity, smaller bears (< 120
kg) made greater weight gains than very large bears on herbaceous vegetati
on. Smaller bears with ad libitum access to palatable, nutritious forbs gai
ned weight at rates equal to wild bears. However, depending upon plant char
acteristics, bite sizes and available daily foraging time increasingly prev
ented large bears (> 120 kg) from gaining weight on herbaceous vegetation.
Both captive and wild bears select forbs over grasses at similar growth sta
ges because forbs are generally higher in protein and more digestible than
grasses. Therefore, the nutritional well-being of wild grizzly bears could
be improved in areas where bears are largely herbivorous and, thus, relativ
ely small by purposefully managing for nutritious forbs.