Responsibility for truth in research

Authors
Citation
Wa. Nelson-rees, Responsibility for truth in research, PHI T ROY B, 356(1410), 2001, pp. 849-851
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
09628436 → ACNP
Volume
356
Issue
1410
Year of publication
2001
Pages
849 - 851
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-8436(20010629)356:1410<849:RFTIR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
For over half a century, cell cultures derived from animals and humans have served researchers in various fields. To this day, cross-contamination of cultures has plagued many researchers, often leading to mistaken results, r etractions of results, cover-ups and some out-and-out falsification of data and results following inadvertent use of the wrong cells. Also, during yea rs of examining cultures for purity we learned that many virologists were n ot too concerned about the specificity of the cultures they used to propaga te the particular virus under study as long as the substrate (whatever it m ight have been) gave optimal virus yield. Polio virus propagates in primate cells, and much research has involved cells from man and various species o f primates. In the 1950s a large number of chimpanzees were held in captivi ty in Africa for extensive studies of the efficacy of polio vaccine in prod uction at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia and elsewhere. Chimpanzee ti ssues, particularly kidneys, were thus readily available and could have als o provided substrates for polio virus production, since little was known ab out the purity of substrates and little attention was paid to their specifi city at that time.