Gj. Hofmeyr et al., Side-effects of oral misoprostol in the third stage of labour - A randomised placebo-controlled trial, S AFR MED J, 91(5), 2001, pp. 432-435
Background. Misoprostol, an inexpensive, stable, orally active prostaglandi
n analogue, has been suggested for use in the prevention of postpartum haem
orrhage. Potential side-effects, however, need to be quantified.
Objective. To compare the rate of postpartum shivering and pyrexia followin
g oral misoprostol 600 mug and placebo.
Design. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Women in labour were rando
mly allocated to receive either misoprostoi 600 mug orally or placebo after
delivery. Conventional oxytocics were given immediately if blood loss was
thought to be more than usual. Side-effects were recorded. Postpartum blood
loss in the first hour was measured by collection in a special Rat plastic
bedpan.
Setting. The labour ward of an academic hospital in Johannesburg, with 7 00
0 deliveries per annum.
Main outcome measures. Shivering and pyrexia.
Results. The groups were well matched. Misoprostol use was associated with
more shivering (44% versus 11%, relative risk (RR) 4.03, 95% confidence int
erval (CI) 2.85 - 5.70), pyrexia greater than or equal to 37.8 degreesC (38
% v. 6%, RR 6.23, CI 3.89 - 9.97), 1-hour systolic blood pressure greater t
han or equal to 140 mmHg (33% v. 25%, RR 1.32, CI 1.03 - 1.70), and diastol
ic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg (10.5% v. 3.0%, RR 3.44,
CI 1.67 - 7.11). There were no other significant differences. The study wa
s not designed to be large enough to assess a difference in blood loss grea
ter than or equal to 1 000 ml (9% v. 9.7%, RR 0.93, CI 0.56 - 1.53). Possib
le effects on blood loss may have been obscured by the lesser use of additi
onal oxytocics in the misoprostol group (14% v. 18%, RR 0.78, CI 0.54 - 1.1
3).
Conclusions. This study has shown the association of postpartum oral misopr
ostol 600 mug with shivering, pyrexia and hypertension. The increased blood
pressure, as for the trend towards increased abdominal pain, may be second
ary to the uterotonic effect of misoprostol. Large randomised trials are ne
eded to assess the effectiveness of misoprostol in the prevention of postpa
rtum haemorrhage, against which the disadvantages demonstrated here can be
weighed.