Background: Perforated appendicitis is associated with a significant risk o
f postoperative abdominal and wound infection. Only a few controversial stu
dies evaluate the role of laparoscopy in perforated appendicitis. The signi
ficance of conversion from laparoscopy to open appendectomy for perforated
appendicitis is not well defined. Statistical analysis was performed using
Student's t-test.
Methods: Data on 52 patients with perforated appendicitis were prospectivel
y collected and retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 18 had lapa
roscopic appendectomies (LA); 24 had open appendectomies (OA); and 10 had c
onverted appendectomies (CA). The indications for either method were based
on the attending surgeons's philosophy. Laparoscopic appendectomy was perfo
rmed using a retro-grade stapler technique. Operative time, hospital stay,
ability to tolerate a liquid diet, and postoperative infectious complicatio
ns were documented.
Results: No statistically significant difference in the operative time in m
inutes was found between the LA (114 +/- 29.3), CA (120.0 +/- 32.2), and OA
(105.8 +/- 64.1) groups (p = NS). There was no statistically significance
difference in length of stay (days) between the LA (9.2 +/- 4.1), OA (10.5
+/- 3.3), and CA (10.0 +/- 1.8) groups. The wound infection rate was less f
requent in the LA group (0%) than in OA (14%) and CA (10%) groups. The rate
of intra-abdominal abscess infections (IAAs) and ileus were 22% and 28%, r
espectively, in LA group, 38% and 29%, respectively, in OA group, and 60% a
nd 50%, respectively, in CA group.
Conclusions: No difference in the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abs
cesses exists between laparoscopic and open appendectomy for perforated app
endicitis. Wound infections and ileus complicate the postoperative course o
f patients after laparoscopic appendectomy less frequently than after open
appendectomy. The conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomy for perfo
rated appendicitis is associated with increased postoperative morbidity.