E. Bannerman et al., EVALUATION OF VALIDITY OF BRITISH ANTHROPOMETRIC REFERENCE DATA FOR ASSESSING NUTRITIONAL STATE OF ELDERLY PEOPLE IN EDINBURGH - CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY, BMJ. British medical journal, 315(7104), 1997, pp. 338-341
Objectives: To evaluate the appropriateness of two sets of commonly us
ed anthropometric reference data for nutritional assessment of elderly
people. Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Two general practices
in Edinburgh. Subjects: 200 independently living men and women aged 7
5 or over randomly recruited from the age and sex register of the prac
tices. Main outcome measures: Weight (kg), knee height (cm), demispan
(cm), mid-upper arm circumference (cm), triceps skinfold thickness (mm
), arm muscle circumference (cm) body mass index (kg/m(2)), and demiqu
et (kg/m(2)) in men and minder (kg/m) in women. Results: Men and women
in Edinburgh were significantly shorter than those in measured for th
e Nottingham reference data (demispan 0.79 v 0.80 (P < 0.05) for men a
nd 0.72 v 0.73 (P < 0.01) for women). Comparison with data from South
Wales showed that men and women from Edinburgh had significantly great
er mid-upper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, and arm mu
scle circumference. No one fell below the 10th centile of the South Wa
les data (the commonly used cut off point for determining malnutrition
) for these measures. Conclusions: Both sets of reference data commonl
y used in Britain may be inappropriate for nutritional screening of el
derly people in Edinburgh. Contemporary reference data appropriate for
the whole of Britain need to be developed, and in the longer term bio
logically or clinically defined criteria for undernutrition should be
established.