Jp. Kooman et al., A comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in renal transplant patients with chronic transplant nephropathy, AM J KIDNEY, 37(6), 2001, pp. 1170-1176
Hypertension is an important risk factor for chronic transplant nephropathy
. Therapy is usually based on casual office blood pressure (BP) measurement
s. However, it is not well known how casual BP predicts 24-hour BP in this
population. The main focus of this study is to compare casual office BP wit
h 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring in renal transplant recipients with sign
s of chronic transplant nephropathy. Moreover, in this group, the day-night
BP profile was assessed. In 36 renal transplant recipients with incipient
or progressive proteinuria or an increase in serum creatinine level greater
than 20%, 24-hour ambulatory BP was performed. Patients were defined as a
nondipper if the mean BP decreased by less than 10% during the nighttime pe
riod. The correlation between single office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs was
0.61 for systolic BP and 0.55 for diastolic BP (P < 0.001). The mean differ
ence between 24-hour ambulatory and single office BPs was -4.2 +/- 18.6 mm
Hg (range, -44 to 36 mm Hg) for systolic BP and -1.1 +/- 10.7 mm Hg (range,
-34 to 27 mm Hg) for diastolic BP; 94.5% of patients were classified as no
ndippers. There was a significant relation between the nightly decline in m
ean arterial pressure and calculated creatinine clearance (r = 0.34; P < 0.
05). In conclusion, in renal transplant recipients with chronic transplant
nephropathy, a large difference between office and ambulatory BPs is presen
t, with both overestimation and underestimation of 24-hour BP by office BP
measurements. Moreover, a severely disturbed day-night BP rhythm was observ
ed. In transplant recipients with compromised graft function, office BP may
not reflect 24-hour BP adequately, and ambulatory BP measurements should b
e considered. (C) 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.