Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease - A meta-analysis of patient-level data

Citation
Th. Jafar et al., Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease - A meta-analysis of patient-level data, ANN INT MED, 135(2), 2001, pp. 73-87
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00034819 → ACNP
Volume
135
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
73 - 87
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(20010717)135:2<73:AEIAPO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for treatment of nondiab etic renal disease. Data Sources: 11 randomized, controlled trials comparing the efficacy of an tihypertensive regimens including ACE inhibitors to the efficacy of regimen s without ACE inhibitors in predominantly nondiabetic renal disease. Study Selection: studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE database for English-language studies evaluating the effects of ACE inhibitors on re nal disease in humans between May 1977 (when ACE inhibitors were approved f or trials in humans) and September 1997. Data Extraction: Data on 1860 nondiabetic patients were analyzed. Data Synthesis: Mean duration of follow-up was 2.2 years. Patients in the A CE inhibitor group had a greater mean decrease in systolic and diastolic bl ood pressure (4.5 mm Hg [95% CI, 3.0 to 6.1 mm Hg]) and 2.3 mm Hg [CI, 1.4 to 3.2 mm Hg], respectively) and urinary protein excretion (0.46 g/d [CI, 0 .33 to 0.59 g/d]), After adjustment for patient and study characteristics a t baseline and changes in systolic blood pressure and urinary protein excre tion during follow-up, relative risks in the ACE inhibitor group were 0.69 (CI, 0.51 to 0.94) for end-stage renal disease and 0.70 (CI, 0.55 to 0.88) far the combined outcome of doubling of the baseline serum creatinine conce ntration or end-stage renal disease. Patients with greater urinary protein excretion at baseline benefited more from ACE inhibitor therapy (P= 0.03 an d P= 0.001, respectively), but the data were inconclusive as to whether the benefit extended to patients with baseline urinary protein excretion less than 0.5 g/d. Conclusion: Antihypertensive regimens that include ACE inhibitors are more effective than regimens without ACE inhibitors in slowing the progression o f nondiabetic renal disease. The beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors is med iated by factors in addition to decreasing blood pressure and urinary prote in excretion and is greater in patients with proteinuria. Angiotensin-conve rting inhibitors are indicated for treatment of nondiabetic patients with c hronic renal disease and proteinuria and, possibly, those without proteinur ia.