Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonancecholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Th. Liu et al., Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonancecholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ANN SURG, 234(1), 2001, pp. 33-40
Objective
To assess the utility of triage guidelines for patients with cholelithiasis
and suspected choledocholithiasis, incorporating selective use of magnetic
resonance cholangiography (MRC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancrea
tography (ERCP) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).
Summary Background Data
ERCP is the most frequently used modality for the diagnosis and resolution
of choledocholithiasis before LC, MRC has recently emerged as an accurate,
noninvasive modality for the detection of choledocholithiasis. However, use
ful strategies for implementing this diagnostic modality for patient evalua
tion before LC have not been investigated.
Methods
During a 18-month period, the authors prospectively evaluated all patients
before LC using triage guidelines incorporating patient information obtaine
d from clinical evaluation, serum chemistry analysis, and abdominal ultraso
nography. Patients were then assigned to one of four groups based on the le
vel of suspicion for choledocholithiasis (group I, extremely high; group 2,
high; group 3, moderate; group 4, low). Group 1 patients underwent ERCP an
d clearance of common bile duct stones; group 2 patients underwent MRC; gro
up 3 patients underwent LC with intraoperative cholangiography; and group 4
patients underwent LC without intraoperative cholangiography.
Results
Choledocholithiasis was detected in 43 of 440 patients (9.8%), The occurren
ce of choledocholithiasis among patients in the four groups were 92.6% (25/
27), 32.4% (12/37), 3.8% (2/52), and 0.9% (3/324) for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4
, respectively (P < .001). MRC was used for 8.4% (37/440) of patients. Pati
ent triage resulted in the identification of common bile duct stones during
preoperative ERCP in 92.3% (36/39) of the patients. Unsuspected common bil
e duct stones occurred in six patients (1.4%).
Conclusions
The probability of choledocholithiasis can be accurately assessed based on
information obtained during the initial noninvasive evaluation. Stratificat
ion of risks for choledocholithiasis facilitates patient: management: with
the most appropriate diagnostic studies and interventions, thereby improvin
g patient care and resource utilization.