Growth of the black-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera, at nine culture sites of French Polynesia: synthesis of several sampling designs conducted between 1994 and 1999

Citation
S. Pouvreau et V. Prasil, Growth of the black-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera, at nine culture sites of French Polynesia: synthesis of several sampling designs conducted between 1994 and 1999, AQU LIV RES, 14(3), 2001, pp. 155-163
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES
ISSN journal
09907440 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
155 - 163
Database
ISI
SICI code
0990-7440(200105/06)14:3<155:GOTBPO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Between 1994 and 1999, several sampling designs were used to measure the gr owth of the black-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera var. cumingi at different sites in French Polynesia. Using a common statistical method, gro wth data were analysed for nine sites and showed significant geographic var iability. Parameters of the Von Bertalanffy model, fitted on the nine data sets, ranged from 147 to 186.5 mm for the H-infinity parameter and from 0.4 2 to 0.58 year(-1) for the k parameter. The phi parameter (combination of H -infinity and k) provided a ranking classification of growth in these nine sites: growth was low in closed atoll lagoons, such as Takapoto, whereas th e island lagoons and ocean habitat supported a very promising shell growth. Calculated on the basis of these models, two parameters of interest for pe arl farming were computed: 1) the time for pearl oysters to reach a size of 100 mm (size at which they are suitable for nucleus implantation), which r anged from 21 to 26 months, and 2) the annual shell growth increment at thi s size (correlated to the rate of nacreous deposition on the pearl), which varied from 19.7 to 31.8 mm.year(-1). The combination of these two sets of results demonstrated that the time necessary to produce a comparable pearl varied significantly according to the site. Several hypotheses to explain t he differences observed in the growth of P: margaritifera in these nine sit es are proposed. The most reasonable would appear to be: 1) the negative ef fect of high temperature (> 30 degreesC), and 2) the degree of water renewa l and food supply around the bivalve. Although this paper demonstrated sign ificant variability in growth performance in the nine investigated sites, f urther investigations are needed, especially concerning the flesh growth ra te. Indeed, this highly relevant parameter, which reflects both bivalve hea lth and the suitability of farming sites, has received very little attentio n to date. (C) 2001 Ifremer/CNRS/Inra/IRD/Cemagref/Editions scientifiques e t medicales Elsevier SAS.