Ba. Mincey et al., Role of axillary node dissection in patients with T1a and T1b breast cancer - Mayo Clinic experience, ARCH SURG, 136(7), 2001, pp. 779-782
Hypothesis: The incidence of nodal positivity in patients with early breast
cancer is low, and axillary lymph node dissection may not be justified in
all such patients.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Tertiary institution.
Patients: All patients with T1a and T1b breast cancer who had both primary
breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection at Mayo Clinic in Jackson
ville, Fla, from January 1, 1992, through February 28, 1998.
Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Tumor size and biological grade
, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, number of nodes harvested, and
number of nodes positive for disease.
Results: Of 163 patients studied, 39 had T1a and 124 had T1b tumors. Node p
ositivity was 0% for T1a and 11.3% for T1b tumors (P=.03). Lymph node invol
vement and estrogen receptor status were not related (P=.29). However, the
risk of lymph node positivity for progesterone receptor-negative (P=.01) an
d estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-negative tumors was sign
ificantly higher than for progesterone and estrogen/progesterone receptor-p
ositive tumors (P=.04). Furthermore, the risk of lymph node positivity was
significantly higher as tumor size increased (P=.002). Finally, higher tumo
r grade conferred a higher risk of lymph node involvement (P=.02).
Conclusions: T1a tumors have minimal risk of nodal positivity and may not r
equire subsequent axillary lymph node dissection in the future. T1b tumors
should be managed with routine analysis of axillary lymph node status. Whet
her sentinel node mapping can change this standard awaits further study.