Male hamsters (30 per group) were fed five different semi-purified diets ad
libitum. The diets, containing 30% of energy (en%) as fat, differed in the
ir dietary fat composition (specified fatty acids exchanged at 10 en%) and
were fed for 4 weeks. The five fatty acids compared in mixed triglycerides
were elaidic acid (C18:1 9t), vaccenic acid (C18:1 lit), their tis-counterp
art oleic acid (C18:1 9t), medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA: C8:0 and C10:0),
and palmitic acid (C16:0). Compared with oleic acid, dietary MCFA and palm
itic acid tended to increase blood cholesterol levels in the hamsters. The
effect of elaidic and vaccenic acid on blood cholesterol did not differ fro
m that of oleic acid. When elaidic acid and vaccenic acids were compared di
rectly, the ratio of LDL/HDL-cholesterol in plasma was significantly higher
in hamsters fed vaccenic acid than in those fed elaidic acid, and elaidic
acid was incorporated at low levels, but more efficiently than vaccenic aci
d at the sn-2 position of platelet phospholipids. Biological consequences o
f this low incorporation are considered unlikely as levels of arachidonic a
cid (C20:4 n-6) and docosohexaenoic acid (C22:6 n-3) in the platelet phosph
olipids of all dietary groups did not differ. With respect to the effect on
the LDL/HDL-cholesterol ratio, elaidic acid may be preferable to vaccenic
acid. We conclude that this animal study does not provide evidence for the
suggestion, based on epidemiological observations, that elaidic acid would
be more detrimental to cardiovascular risk than vaccenic acid. (C) 2001 Els
evier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.