As portable, handheld computing devices become more common, alternatives to
traditional keyboards must be explored. These alternatives must be compact
, lightweight and sufficiently efficient to support the users' tasks. One a
lternative is the use of small physical keyboards or soft keyboards present
ed on touch-sensitive surfaces. Many alternative layouts have been explored
, including the QWERTY, Dvorak, telephone and various alphabetic organizati
ons. Soukoreff and MacKenzie proposed a model to predict typing times for a
lternative layouts, but have experienced limited success matching their pre
dictions to observed performance. This paper proposes a revision of the vis
ual search component of their model that considers the familiarity of the o
rganization and the number of letters represented by each key. Results are
reported of an experiment that supports the claim that both familiarity and
the number of letters per key must be considered when predicting visual se
arch times for alternative keyboard layouts.