The radiological community has a long track record of self-examination
, starting well before evidence-based medicine came of age. It had to
produce such evidence to prove the need for and win funds for its expe
nsive gadgets. The assessment of new tests is easier than proving the
value of well-established ones, and in scrutinising the evidence base
for an imaging technique a balance must be struck between apparent (eg
, diagnostic) benefit and real benefit to the patient. And even when t
here is a wealth of good evidence healthy debate continues. So radiolo
gy may be ahead of some other disciplines in considering the evidence
for its daily practice. For example, where is the evidence for the rou
tine clinical examination-and might the radiologist with a chest X-ray
and abdominal ultrasound do better?