Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of a cytomegalovirus-specific monoclonal antibody (MSL-109) for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
M. Boeckh et al., Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of a cytomegalovirus-specific monoclonal antibody (MSL-109) for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, BIOL BLOOD, 7(6), 2001, pp. 343-351
MSL-109 is a monoclonal antibody specific to the cytomegalovirus (CMV) glyc
oprotein H with high neutralizing capacity. In a prospective, randomized, d
ouble-blind study allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
recipients with positive donor and/or recipient serology for CMV before tr
ansplantation received either 60 mg/kg MSL-109 (n = 59), 15 mg/kg MSL-109 (
n = 60), or placebo (n = 60) intravenously every 2 weeks from day -1 until
day 84 after transplantation. CMV pp65 antigenemia, CMV-DNA load in plasma,
and viremia by culture were tested weekly. Primary end points were develop
ment of pp65 antigenemia at any level and/or viremia for which ganciclovir
was given. There was no statistically significant difference in CMV pp65 an
tigenemia or viremia among patients in the 60-mg group (pp65 antigenemia, 4
7%; viremia, 15%), the 15-mg group (52%; 23%), and the placebo group (45%;
17%). There was also no difference in maximum levels of pp65 antigenemia, t
ime to clearance of pp65 antigenemia after start of ganciclovir, CMV diseas
e, invasive bacterial and fungal infections, time to neutrophil and platele
t engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease, days of hospitalization, an
d overall survival rate among the 3 groups. However, a subgroup analysis of
CMV-seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (D+/R-) showed a tra
nsiently improved survival rate by day 100 in MSL-109 recipients (mortality
: 60-mg group, 1/13; 15-mg group, 1/12; placebo group, 6/10 [P = .02 for 60
-mg versus placebo groups; P = .08 for 15-mg versus placebo groups]); by th
e end of follow-up, the difference was no longer statistically significant.
Tile improved survival rate in D+/R- patients could not be attributed to a
reduction in CMV disease; however, MSL-109 was associated with improved pl
atelet engraftment and less grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease
in this subgroup. In a subgroup analysis of CMV-seropositive recipients of
MSL-109 (D+/R+ and D-/R+), overall mortality was increased compared to tha
t of the placebo group (P = .12 for the 60-mg versus placebo groups, P = .0
5 for the 15-mg versus placebo groups, and P = .04 for the dose levels comb
ined versus placebo). MSL-109 was well tolerated and no immune response to
the drug was observed. Thus, MSL-109 was safe but did not reduce CMV infect
ion in allogeneic HSCT recipients. The transient survival advantage seen ea
rly after transplantation in CMV D+/R- patients and the negative effect on
survival in seropositive patients remain unexplained. Thus, there is no evi
dence that MSL-109 is beneficial in CMV-seropositive HSCT recipients.