Occupational exposure to anaesthetic gases and urinary excretion of D-glucaric acid

Citation
Ml. Scapellato et al., Occupational exposure to anaesthetic gases and urinary excretion of D-glucaric acid, BIOMARKERS, 6(4), 2001, pp. 294-301
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
BIOMARKERS
ISSN journal
1354750X → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
294 - 301
Database
ISI
SICI code
1354-750X(200107/08)6:4<294:OETAGA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
In order to ascertain whether the urinary excretion of D-glucaric acid (DGA ) might be a suitable biomarker of effect in monitoring workers exposed to anaesthetic gases, we measured DGA before and after an operating session (a nd, in some workers, before and after a 2-week vacation) in 229 workers of surgical units and in 229 controls. In the former, we also measured urinary levels of nitrous oxide (N2O) and isoflurane after at least 4 h of exposur e. For all subjects, information on age, smoking habits, daily intake of al cohol, coffee, and drugs, history of liver or kidney disease was collected. Study subjects were ranked according to: exposure (class 0: subjects not e xposed; class 1: N2O < 27 <mu>g l(-1) and isoflurane < 1 <mu>g l(-1); class 2: N2O < 27 <mu>g l(-1) and isoflurane >1 mug l(-1); class 3: N2O > 27 mug l(-1) and isoflurane < 1 <mu>g l(-1); class 4: N2O > 27 mug l(-1) and isof lurane >1 mug l(-1)); general habits; and DGA (two groups, below and above the arbitrary cut-off value of 3.5 mmol mol(-1) creatinine). The relative r isk of presenting high DGA excretion was estimated through the Odds Ratio ( OR) and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI). In univariate analysis, ORs increas ed from class 1 (lowest exposure) to class 4 (highest exposure) and with in creases in coffee and cigarette consumption. The ORs adjusted for sex, age, creatinine, and alcohol and coffee intake, conventionally 1.0 in the contr ol group, were 0.68 (CI = 0.33-1.38), 2.68 (CI = 1.36-5.27), 2.68 (CI = 1.2 1-4.90) and 3.73 (CI = 1.51-9.18) respectively in exposure classes 1, 2, 3 and 4. By contrast, individual levels of DGA did not correlate with urinary concentrations of anaesthetic gases. Moreover, no significant differences in DGA levels were observed between urine samples taken before and immediat ely after a workshift, nor between samples collected before and after at le ast 2 weeks vacation. In conclusion, DGA excretion cannot be used as an ind ividual biomarker of effect in workers exposed to anaesthetic gases. Since effects on hepatic function were not found at lower concentrations (exposur e class 1), the currently adopted threshold limits (isoflurane: 1 mug l(-1) ; and N2O: 27 mug l(-1)) appear sufficiently protective.