Aim Historically the difficulty of third molar surgery has been judged usin
g radiologically assessed dental factors specifically tooth morphology and
position. This study investigated additional factors that have a bearing on
the difficulty of extraction.
Study design A prospective study undertaken by three clinical assistant gra
de surgeons who removed 354 single mandibular third molar teeth under day c
ase anaesthesia over the 4-year period (1994-1998),
Method Data relating to patient, dental and surgical variables were collect
ed contemporaneously as the patients were treated. The difficulty of extrac
tion was estimated by the surgeons pre-operatively using dental radiographi
c features and compared by the same surgeon within the actual surgical diff
iculty encountered at surgery. Operation time strongly related to both pre
and post treatment assessments of difficulty and proved to be the best meas
ure of surgical difficulty.
Results Univariate analysis identified increased patient age, ethnic backgr
ound, male gender, increased weight, bone impaction, horizontal angulation,
depth of application, unfavourable root formation, proximity to inferior a
lveolar canal and surgeon as factors increasing operative time. Multivariat
e analysis showed that increasing age (P = 0.014), patient weight (P = 0.02
4), ethnicity (P = 0.019), application depth (P = 0.001), bone impaction (p
= 0.008) and unfavourable root formation (P = 0.009) were independent pred
ictors for difficulty of extraction. Conclusions Half of the six independen
t factors that predicted surgical difficulty of third molar extraction were
patient variables.