Lowering the doses of mifepristone and gemeprost for early abortion: a randomised controlled trial

Citation
A. Templeton et al., Lowering the doses of mifepristone and gemeprost for early abortion: a randomised controlled trial, BR J OBST G, 108(7), 2001, pp. 738-742
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
ISSN journal
14700328 → ACNP
Volume
108
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
738 - 742
Database
ISI
SICI code
1470-0328(200107)108:7<738:LTDOMA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objective To test the efficacy of lower doses of mifepristone and gemeprost for medical induction of early abortion. Design Randomised controlled trial. Participants were blinded as to the the rapy and physicians to the dose of mifepristone. Setting Thirteen hospital gynaecological units in different continents. Participants 1224 healthy pregnant women requesting medical abortion at < 5 7 days from last menses. Intervention Random allocation to one of four regimens: mifepristone 50 mg by mouth followed by either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg gemeprost vaginally on day 3; mifepristone 200 mg by mouth followed by either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg gemeprost vaginally. We concealed the allocation sequence from clinicians enrolling p articipants, and maintained double blinding throughout. Main outcome measures Incidence of complete abortion: subordinate outcome m easures included side effects such as vomiting and fall in haemoglobin, as well as the need for emergency curettage and blood transfusion. Results The success rate was significantly related to the dose of mifeprist one. The relative risk of failure to have a complete abortion with the lowe r dose of mifepristone was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1-2.3) times that with the higher dose. The relative risk of failure with the lower dose of gemeprost (1.3; 95% CI: 0.9-1.8) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions A single dose of mifepristone 50 mg followed by gemeprost is in adequate for early medical abortion. There was no significant difference in side effects between the four treatment groups.