Prospective randomized trial of polypropylene mesh compared with nylon darn in inguinal hernia repair

Citation
A. Koukourou et al., Prospective randomized trial of polypropylene mesh compared with nylon darn in inguinal hernia repair, BR J SURG, 88(7), 2001, pp. 931-934
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00071323 → ACNP
Volume
88
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
931 - 934
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1323(200107)88:7<931:PRTOPM>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background: The main aim of this study was to evaluate outcome in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair with either polypropylene mesh or ny lon darn. Methods: This was a randomized prospective trial of patients who underwent the procedure with follow-up at 1 week, 6 weeks and 1 year. Results: One hundred men underwent 105 repairs by consultant surgeons and r egistrars; there were 54 mesh and 51 nylon repairs. Demographics in both gr oups were similar at the start of the trial, as were the types of hernia. T he pain scores at 24, 48 and 72 h were similar, as was the duration of anal gesia requirement. There were no differences in early or late complications . Return to normal activity in each group was also similar, with a mean tim e of 5 weeks. The recurrence rate in both groups was comparable: 4 per cent after mesh repair and 4 per cent after darn repair at 1-year review. Conclusion: Open inguinal hernia repair with a nylon darn was equivalent to polypropylene mesh with respect to early measures of postoperative outcome and recurrence at 1 year.