Study objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetit
ive pharyngeal collapse during sleep. Several techniques have been proposed
to assess the collapsibility of the upper airway in awake humans, but slee
p-wake comparisons have rarely been attempted and there air? few studies co
mparing OSA patients to control subjects, We sought to compare two collapsi
bility measurement techniques between normal and apneic subjects, and betwe
en wakefulness and sleep.
Design: We conducted three studies. First, we examined whether collapsibili
ty assessed by negative pressure pulses (NPPs) during wakefulness reflected
values during sleep in 21 normal subjects. Second we determined in these n
ormal subjects whether collapsibility during sleep assessed by NPPs was pre
dictive of collapsibility measured by inspiratory resistive loading (LRL).
Finally, we compared upper-airway collapsibility between apnea patients (n
= 22) and normal volunteers (n = 38) during wakefulness by MPPs,
Setting: Clinical and research laboratories at the Brigham and Women's Hosp
ital.
Participants: Two populations of normal subjects (n = 21 and n 38) and OSA
patients (n = 22),
Measurements and results: Collapsibility during wakefulness, as measured by
NPPs, correlated significantly with collapsibility during sleep (r = 0.62;
p = 0.003), There was also a significant correlation between the two measu
res of collapsibility (IRL and NPP) during sleep (r = 0.53; p = 0.01). Both
measures revealed a significant increase in pharyngeal collapsibility duri
ng sleep as comp:ucd to wakefulness. Finally, apnea patients had significan
tly greater pharyngeal collapsibility than control subjects during wakefuln
ess (p = 0.017),
Conclusions: These data suggest that upper-airway collapsibility measured d
uring wakefulness does provide useful physiologic information about pharyng
eal mechanics during sleep and demonstrates clear differences between indiv
iduals with and without sleep apnea.