M. Leone et al., Prevention of nosocomial urinary tract infection in ICU patients - Comparison of effectiveness of two urinary drainage systems, CHEST, 120(1), 2001, pp. 220-224
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objectives: To determine whether the rate of acquisition of bacteriur
ia differs between the use of a complex closed drainage system (CCDS) with
a preattached catheter, antireflux valve, drip chamber, and povidone-iodine
releasing cartridge, and a two-chamber open drainage system (TCOS) in ICU
patients.
Design: Prospective, nonrandomized, controlled trial.
Setting: Medical/surgical/trauma ICU in a university hospital.
Patients: Two hundred twenty-four ICU patients requiring an indwelling urin
ary catheter,
Intervention: We compared the rate of acquisition of bacteriuria in two gro
ups of consecutive patients (n = 113 and n = 111, respectively) who underwe
nt bladder catheterization with a TCOS during the first 6 months and with a
CCDS during the next 6 months. Urinary catheters were managed by a team of
trained nurses following the same written protocol, No prophylactic antibi
otics were administered, either during management of catheter placements or
catheter withdrawal, but 75% of patients received one or more antimicrobia
l medications for treatment of infected sites other than the urinary tract.
Urine samples were obtained weekly for the duration of catheterization and
within 24 h after catheter removal, and each time symptoms of urinary infe
ction were suspected. Only patients who required an indwelling catheter for
> 48 h were evaluated.
Measurements and results: There was no statistical difference in the rate o
f bacteriuria between the two groups. Bacteriuria occurred in 11.5% and 13.
5% of patients, and was diagnosed on day 14 +/- 8 and 13 +/- 9 of catheteri
zation (mean +/- SD) for the TCOS and the CCDS, respectively. A CCDS cost $
3 (US dollars) more than the TCOS,
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the effec
tiveness of a TCOS and a CCDS in ICU patients. No differences were noted be
tween the two systems (alpha = 0.05). The higher cost of a CCDS is not just
ified for ICU patients.