Purpose: This two-part project was designed to test a pressure-sensitive th
eory of marginal velopharyngeal inadequacy (MPVI). Specifically are select
subgroups of children with MPVI perceived as hypernasal because they fail t
o achieve consistent closure during vowels and semivowels while demonstrati
ng adequate closure during pressure consonants?
Methods: In part one, 36 children with cleft palate and other craniofacial
anomalies were examined using a clinical assessment protocol that included
nasometry and perceived ratings of hypernasal resonance. Children with nasa
lance percentages above threshold during low-pressure (LP) productions and
below threshold for high-pressure (HP) productions were placed in one group
(group 1), while children with nasalance percentages below threshold for b
oth LP and HP sentences were placed in another (group 2). Children in the t
wo groups were age- and sex-matched. In part two, endoscopic data were exam
ined for 10 additional children who received nasometry, perceived hypernasa
l resonance scores, and videoendoscopy on the same day and who received hig
her mean nasalance measures during production of LP sentences than during p
roduction of HP sentences,
Results: The results of part one confirmed that children in group 1 were pe
rceived as being significantly more hypernasal than children in group 2 (me
an(group 1) = 2.17, mean(group 2) = 1.50; t = 2,75, p = .01). However, resu
lts of endoscopic testing failed to demonstrate a consistent observable phy
siologic pattern of vetopharyngeal inadequacy that would confirm the theory
that some patients with MVPI are perceived as being hypernasal because of
difficulty achieving velopharyngeal closure during vowels and semivowels.
Conclusions: The findings provide partial support for a pressure-sensitive
theory of MVPI and demonstrate the value of using both HP and LP sentences
to evaluate patients with MVPI.