Jm. Delhaye, Some issues related to the modeling of interfacial areas in gas-liquid flows I. The conceptual issues, CR A S IIB, 329(5), 2001, pp. 397-410
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Mechanical Engineering
Journal title
COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE II FASCICULE B-MECANIQUE
Two-phase flow modeling has been under constant development for the past fo
rty years. valid for two-phase flows where the phases are strongly coupled
to the two-fluid model valid for two-phase flows where the phases are a pri
ori weakly coupled. However the latter model has been used extensively in c
omputer codes because of its potential in handling many different physical
situations.
The two-fluid model is based on the balance equations for mass, momentum an
d energy, averaged in a certain sense and expressed for each phase and for
the interface between the phases. The difficulty in using the two-fluid mod
el stems from the closure relations needed to arrive at a complete set of p
artial differential equations describing the flow. These closure relations
should supply the information lost during the averaging of the balance equa
tions and should specify in particular the interactions of mass, momentum a
nd energy between the phases. Another requirement for the interaction terms
is that they should satisfy the interfacial balance equations. Some of the
se terms such as the added mass term or the lift force term do not depend o
n the interfacial area but some others do, such as the mass transfer term,
the drag term or the heat flux term. It is then necessary to model the inte
rfacial area in order to evaluate the corresponding fluxes. Another benefit
resulting from the modeling of the interfacial area would be to replace th
e usual static flow pattern maps which specify the flow configuration by a
dynamic follow-up of the flow pattern. All these reasons explain why so muc
h effort has been put during the past twenty years on the modeling and meas
urement of the interfacial area in two-phase flows. This article contains t
wo parts. The first one deals with the conceptual issues and has the follow
ing objectives:
1. to give precise definitions of the interfacial area concentrations;
2. to explain the origin of the interfacial area concentration transport eq
uation suggested by M. Ishii in 1975;
3. to explain some paradoxical behaviors encountered when calculating the i
nterfacial area concentration transport velocity.
(C) 2001 Academie des sciences/Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier
SAS.