DISCUSSION - [EXPLANATION] IS EXPLANATION BETTER

Robert Wilson (1994) maintains that many interesting and fundamental a spects of psychology are non-individualistic because large chunks of p sychology depend upon organisms being deeply embedded in some environm ent, I disagree and present one version of narrow content that allows enough reference to the environment to meet any wide challenge. I argu e that most psychologists are already this sort of narrow content theo rist and that these narrow content explanations of psychological pheno mena meet Wilson's criteria for being a good explanation better than a ny wide explanation of the same event.