The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene lethal(2)giant larvae is required forthe emission of the Decapentaplegic signal

Citation
N. Arquier et al., The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene lethal(2)giant larvae is required forthe emission of the Decapentaplegic signal, DEVELOPMENT, 128(12), 2001, pp. 2209-2220
Citations number
71
Categorie Soggetti
Cell & Developmental Biology
Journal title
DEVELOPMENT
ISSN journal
09501991 → ACNP
Volume
128
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2209 - 2220
Database
ISI
SICI code
0950-1991(200106)128:12<2209:TDTSGL>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene lethal(2) giant larvae (lgl) encodes a cytoskeletal protein required for the change in shape and polarity acquisi tion of epithelial cells, and also for asymmetric division of neuroblasts, We show here that lgl participates in the emission of Decapentaplegic (Dpp) , a member of the transforming growth factor P (TGF beta) family, in variou s developmental processes, During embryogenesis, lgl is required for the dpp-dependent transcriptional activation of zipper (zip), which encodes the non-muscle myosin heavy chai n (NMHC), in the dorsalmost ectodermal cells - the leading edge cells. The embryonic expression of known targets of the dpp signaling pathway, such as labial or tinman was abolished or strongly reduced in lgl mutants. lgl mut ant cuticles exhibited phenotypes resembling those observed in mutated part ners of the dpp signaling pathway. In addition, lgl was required downstream of dpp and upstream of its receptor Thickveins (Tkv) for the dorsoventral patterning of the ectoderm, During larval development, the expression of sp alt, a dpp target, was abolished in mutant wing discs, while it was restore d by a constitutively activated form of Tkv (Tkv(Q253D)). Taking into accou nt that the activation of dpp expression was unaffected in the mutant, this suggests that lgl function is not required downstream of the Dpp receptor. Finally, the function of lgl responsible for the activation of Spalt expre ssion appeared to be required only in the cells that produce Dpp, and I,ol mutant somatic clones behaved non autonomously. We therefore position the a ctivity of lgl in the cells that produce Dpp, and not in those that respond to the Dpp signal. These results are consistent with a same role for lgl i n exocytosis and secretion as that proposed for its yeast ortholog sro7/77 and lgl might function in parallel or independently of its well-documented role in the control of epithelial cell polarity.