During the past decade, transnationalism has entered the lexicon of migrati
on scholars. As with other terms used in the study of immigration and ethni
city, this concept suffers from ambiguity as a result of competing definiti
ons that fail to specify the temporal and spatial parameters of the term an
d to adequately locate it vis-a-vis older concepts such as assimilation and
cultural pluralism. This article offers a review and critique of the ways
the term has come to be employed at the hands of key spokespersons that hav
e articulated the most sustained theoretical rationales to date for transna
tionalism as a conceptual construct to account for new immigrant identities
and communities. The conclusion of the essay offers in schematic form an a
lternative assessment of transnationalism that locates it as one potential
subset of assimilation theory, rather than as an alternative to it.