Impact of the timing of indomethacin treatment in a model of synchronized bone remodelling in rats

Citation
D. Guez et al., Impact of the timing of indomethacin treatment in a model of synchronized bone remodelling in rats, EXP PHYSIOL, 86(3), 2001, pp. 373-379
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
09580670 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
373 - 379
Database
ISI
SICI code
0958-0670(200105)86:3<373:IOTTOI>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Prostaglandins (PGs) promote both bone resorption and formation ill vitro a nd in vivo. In a synchronised model of bone remodelling, indomethacin, an i nhibitor of PG synthesis, given from the start of the sequence, transiently impaired bone resorption, In this study we further explored the involvemen t of PGs in this model by treating rats,vith indomethacin (7.5 mg kg(-1) da y(-1)) for 6 days from the peak of resorption (day 4 after activation in th is model) or during reversal (day 6 after activation). In rats treated from day 4, the resorption surface (Oc.S/BS) and the number of osteoclasts (N.O c/BPm) were higher on day 10 (+69%, P < 0.01, and +60%, P < 0.02 compared w ith controls, respectively); no effect on cell resorptive activity was obse rved. The bone formation surface (OS/BS) was reduced (-50%, P < 0.01). The inactive surface (ln/BS) was not modified. In rats treated from day 6, the Oc.S/BS was also higher than in controls (P < 0.02), as was the N.Oc/BPm (P < 0.05). Osteoclast activity appeared to be increased, as the osteoclast-b one interface was larger (P < 0.02), but the mean lacuna area was reduced ( -23%, P < 0.05). Bone formation was also strongly affected: the OS/BS was d ecreased (-66%, P < 0.01), as was the osteoid seam thickness (-24%, P < 0.0 5), The In/BS was increased 1.5-fold (P < 0.05). These data indicate that P Gs intervene at various stages of tills remodelling sequence, as both resor ption and formation were affected by indomethacin. Although resorption resu med in the two treatment groups despite treatment continuation, the timing of treatment was clearly important. Only inhibition of PG synthesis at the peak of resorption delayed all phases of the remodelling sequence. In contr ast, inhibition during the reversal phase prevented activation of a signifi cant part of the bone surface usually involved at this stage of remodelling ; this treatment schedule reduced the resorptive capacity of the system, an d depressed osteoblast activity.