Arthritis and related musculoskeletal conditions occur with great frequency
in the population world wide, causing significant morbidity and, in some i
nstances, increased mortality. Affecting both the young and the old, 15% of
the population in the US was estimated in 1995 to have some form of arthri
tis with an increase to 18% projected by the year 2020 ([1]). The economic
impact of arthritis and related disorders in the US alone was estimated to
be US $194.4 billion in 1992 and future costs are virtually certain to incr
ease given the chronic nature of these diseases, their expanding prevalence
and the considerable expense associated with newer therapies ([2]). With n
o cure presently available, the aim of current treatment is to reduce infla
mmation, ameliorate symptoms and improve functional capacity. Non-steroidal
antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which suppress the formation of pro-infla
mmatory prostaglandins by antagonising the action of cyclooxygenase (COX),
have been the mainstay of arthritis treatment for hundreds, if not, thousan
ds of years. The clinical use of NSAIDs, however, has long been associated
with significant toxicity. The recognition of two COX isoforms, cyclooxygen
ase-l (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), both suppressed by traditional
NSAIDs, has led to an expanded hypothesis of NSAID action which consists of
two postulates, namely, the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of arthrit
is is due to the suppression of COX-2, while much of the toxicity associate
d with non-selective NSAIDs is the consequence of COX-1 suppression. The em
ergence of agents which selectively inhibit COX-2 has made it possible to c
linically evaluate the validity of each of these postulates. In this report
, the published experience with selective COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment
of mechanical and inflammatory arthropathies is reviewed to examine the pr
emise that isolated COX-2 suppression is comparable in efficacy to the dual
COX-1/COX-2 suppression produced by non-selective NSAIDs.