Aims: Tubal ectopic hydatidiform moles are rare lesions, and only 40 cases
have been reported in the world literature, We investigated the apparently
high incidence of tubal ectopic hydatidiform moles in women referred for tr
eatment to a Supraregional Trophoblastic Tumour Screening and Treatment Cen
tre between 1986 and 1996.
Methods and results: Of 4261 women referred during the study period, 25 (0.
6%) had a suspected tubal ectopic hydatidiform mole and paraffin-embedded t
issue was available in 20 (80%) of these, Each case was reviewed by two pat
hologists and DNA flow cytometric analysis was undertaken when the histolog
ical diagnosis was initially deemed equivocal or suggestive of hydatidiform
mole. On review, 17 cases (85%) showed no evidence of hydatidiform mole (c
ircumferential trophoblastic proliferation, hydrops, scalloped villi, and s
tromal karyorrhexis), Of these, 11 cases (65%) showed features of early pla
centation and six (35%) showed hydropic abortion. DNA flow cytometry was pe
rformed in 14 (82%) of these cases and revealed a diploid population in eac
h case. Three cases of molar pregnancy (15%) were identified. Each of these
cases had the histological features of an early complete hydatidiform mole
, Sufficient tissue was available for DNA flow cytometric analysis in two o
f these cases and confirmed the presence of diploidy in each.
Conclusions: Our results show that tubal ectopic hydatidiform mole is a rar
e entity and demonstrate that it is over-diagnosed. Polar trophoblastic pro
liferation and hydropic villi are features of early placentation and of hyd
ropic abortion. Sheets of extravillous trophoblast may be particularly prom
inent in tubal ectopic gestation, In the absence of circumferential trophob
lastic proliferation combined with hydropic change a diagnosis of gestation
al trophoblastic disease should be avoided.