BACKGROUND: This study examined whether oral misoprostol exerted a cervical
priming effect in postmenopausal women prior to hysteroscopy. METHOD: Thir
ty-seven patients were randomized to receive either oral misoprostol (400 m
ug) or placebo (vitamin Bg) 12 h prior to hysteroscopy. The resistance of t
he cervix to dilatation was objectively assessed by a cervical tonometer. R
ESULTS: The mean baseline cervical dilatation (4.2 mm in misoprostol group
versus 4.4 mm in placebo group) was similar between the two groups. The mea
n cumulative force measured (27.7 N in misoprostol group versus 21.8 N in p
lacebo group) was also comparable. None of the patients suffered from any s
ignificant side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: These data showed that there were no
significant benefits from giving misoprostol pre-operatively in postmenopau
sal women, and it was concluded that oral misoprostol had no significant ce
rvical priming effect in postmenopausal women.