Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit

Citation
S. Berenholtz et al., Assessing the effectiveness of critical pathways on reducing resource utilization in the surgical intensive care unit, INTEN CAR M, 27(6), 2001, pp. 1029-1036
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
03424642 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1029 - 1036
Database
ISI
SICI code
0342-4642(200106)27:6<1029:ATEOCP>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of procedure-specific surgical cr itical pathways on reducing resource utilization in a university surgical i ntensive care unit (ICU). Design and setting: Prospective cohort study in a university surgical ICU. Patients. 194 patients, accounting for 255 patient days, sampled on randoml y selected days over a 12-month period of time. Measurements and results: The primary outcomes of this study were pathway e ligibility and laboratory utilization. Patients were eligible for a procedu re-specific pathway in 34% of patient days identified, and the patient's cl inical course was "on" pathway in 22% of patient days. Of those "on" the pa thway, 54% had a pathway present in the chart and 32% of these included doc umentation of the patient's clinical course. Thus in 78% of the patient day s the patient was either not eligible for a critical pathway or the patient 's clinical course was "off" pathway. In those patients "on" the pathway 46 % did not have a pathway present in the chart. Being on a critical pathway did not reduce laboratory utilization. Laboratory utilization did not vary between patients "on" and "off" the pathway (19.1 +/- 11.3 laboratory tests /patient day versus 20.4 +/- 5.7 laboratory tests/patient day). Predicted l aboratory utilization by the pathway was 5.6 laboratory tests/patient day. By reducing actual laboratory utilization to that predicted by the critical pathway we would reduce laboratory utilization at our institution by $1.2 million per year. Conclusions: Procedure-specific surgical critical pathways are not an effec tive tool for reducing resource utilization in our ICU. Most of our patient s were not eligible for an available pathway, and those who were eligible a nd were "on" the pathway did not appear to have laboratory utilization guid ed by the pathway. Future initiatives need to explore other means such as I CU-specific care processes to reduce resource utilization in the ICU.