Eg. Romanowski et al., The antiviral resistance and replication of cidofovir-resistant adenovirusvariants in the New Zealand White rabbit ocular model, INV OPHTH V, 42(8), 2001, pp. 1812-1815
PURPOSE. TO determine the antiviral resistance of three cidofovir (CDV)-res
istant variants of adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) and their ability to replicate i
n the New Zealand White rabbit ocular model.
METHODS. Rabbits were inoculated topically in both eyes with the CDV-resist
ant variants R1, R2, and R3, and the Ad5 parental strain. On day 1, rabbits
from each virus inoculation were divided into two topical treatment groups
: 0.5% CDV and PBS control. Treatment was administered twice daily in both
eyes for 7 days. Ah eyes were cultured for virus on days 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 7,
9, 11, and 14. Using viral outcome parameters, CDV resistance was determine
d for each virus by comparing each CDV-treated virus group to its respectiv
e PBS control, and altered pathogenesis was assessed by comparing viral rep
lication in the PBS control groups of the Ad5 parent and the three resistan
t variants.
RESULTS. Topical 0.5% CDV treatment demonstrated significant antiviral inhi
bitory activity in the Ad5 parental group (e.g., reduced total Ad5-positive
cultures, reduced daily Ad5-positive cultures on days 5, 9, 11, and 14, an
d duration of ocular shedding), but had no effect on the three CDV-resistan
t variants. There were no significant differences in pathogenicity between
the Ad5 parent and the CDV-resistant variants.
CONCLUSIONS. The Ad5 variants R1, R2, and R3 were resistant to topical trea
tment with 0.5% cidofovir in the rabbit ocular model. However, the acquisit
ion of CDV resistance did not alter the replication of the three Ad5 CDV va
riants on the rabbit eye.