Purpose. To assess difficulties in reading screening mammographies related
to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the setting of a breast cancer scre
ening program. Disagreement between two readers is used as the assessment c
riterion.
Population and methods: The study population consisted of all women partici
pating in the ADEMAS breast cancer screening program in Bas-Rhin (France).
Agreement between the two radiologists was considered when the same global
conclusion (call-back or not of the women for further examination) or the s
ame conclusion for each of the nine possible lesions was observed.
Results. HRT is associated with a higher risk of disagreement between the t
wo radiologists on global conclusion and on opacities. Conversely, disagree
ment risk is lowered for microcalcifications (whether benign or malignant)
for HRT users.
Conclusion. HRT is associated with a higher risk of disagreement on global
conclusion. This has an impact on whether the women should be called-back o
r not according to reading of breast cancer screening program mammographies
.