Human sperm concentration is usually assessed using hemocytometry (HM). How
ever, external and internal quality control schemes have shown that the acc
uracy of this method is low overall. Flow cytometry (FC) is a rapid, accura
te, and reproducible technology for the quantification of various cell popu
lations. We used 3 FC methods for human sperm counting from a 1:1 mixture o
f a diluted semen sample with a suspension of fluorospheres of known concen
trations. The events that represented sperm cells were detected according t
o 1) gating on size and granularity (FCM1), 2) gating on DNA staining by pr
opidium iodide (FCM2), and 3) a combination of FCM1 and FCM2 (FCM3). Sperm
concentration was calculated from the ratio of detected events to fluorosph
ere counts and fluorosphere concentration. A pilot study undertaken by 12 t
echnicians from different laboratories to compare FCM1 with HM showed a gen
eral agreement between both methods, despite wide variations in sperm conce
ntration exhibited by HM due to the use of unoptimized procedures. A second
experiment indicated that the overall variability in sperm concentration a
ssessment by FCM1 was lower than that produced by HM when performed by 2 te
chnicians using optimal procedures for 3 preparations of the same semen sam
ples. The overall mean coefficients of variation were 3.9% for FCM1 vs 8.0%
for technician 1, 12.3% for technician 2 (P < .05), and 15.7% for both tec
hnicians (P < ,05). FCM1, FCM2, and FCMS were compared with HM performed by
a single trained technician for 39 semen samples (triplicates) of various
quality. Compared with HM, FCM1 and FCM2 overestimated the sperm concentrat
ion by 14% and 8%, respectively, against only 4% per million sperm for FCM3
, which was effective for the full spectrum of sperm concentrations (except
azoospermia). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human sperm conc
entration can be accurately assessed by the FC method combining gating on c
ell size, granularity, and DNA staining.