The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: Evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction
J. Balasch et al., The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: Evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction, J AS REPROD, 18(5), 2001, pp. 250-256
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare o
varian response and oocyte and embryo yields in women undergoing ovulation
induction for IVF/ICSI using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or in comb
ination with recombinant human LH (rhLH).
Methods: Patients were randomized to receive rhFSH alone group F; n = 13) o
r rhFSH + rhLH (group L; n = 15). rhFSH was administered according ro a ste
p-down protocol; patients assigned to group L received rhLH at a fixed dose
of 75 IU (1 ampoule) throughout the treatment period.
Results: The total dose of rhFSH, number of growing follicles, and serum co
ncentrations of estradiol (E-2) on the day of hCG administration were simil
ar in both treatment groups. However the percentage of metaphase II oocytes
and fertilization rate were significantly higher in group F than in group
L. The lower fertilization rates associated with rhLH were also seen in a s
ubgroup of patients from group L who had undergone a prevails ART cycle sti
mulated with FSH only and thus acted as their own controls However, when in
vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmicsperm injection cycles were
considered separately, differences in fertilization rates were statisticall
y significant only for oocytes treated by conventional NE
Conclusions This study shows that the addition of recombinant LH to recombi
nant FSH in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing AR T does not improve the
ovarian response and even may have a negative impact on oocyte maturation
and fertilization.