The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: Evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction

Citation
J. Balasch et al., The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: Evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction, J AS REPROD, 18(5), 2001, pp. 250-256
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
ISSN journal
10580468 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
250 - 256
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-0468(200105)18:5<250:TEOELH>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare o varian response and oocyte and embryo yields in women undergoing ovulation induction for IVF/ICSI using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or in comb ination with recombinant human LH (rhLH). Methods: Patients were randomized to receive rhFSH alone group F; n = 13) o r rhFSH + rhLH (group L; n = 15). rhFSH was administered according ro a ste p-down protocol; patients assigned to group L received rhLH at a fixed dose of 75 IU (1 ampoule) throughout the treatment period. Results: The total dose of rhFSH, number of growing follicles, and serum co ncentrations of estradiol (E-2) on the day of hCG administration were simil ar in both treatment groups. However the percentage of metaphase II oocytes and fertilization rate were significantly higher in group F than in group L. The lower fertilization rates associated with rhLH were also seen in a s ubgroup of patients from group L who had undergone a prevails ART cycle sti mulated with FSH only and thus acted as their own controls However, when in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmicsperm injection cycles were considered separately, differences in fertilization rates were statisticall y significant only for oocytes treated by conventional NE Conclusions This study shows that the addition of recombinant LH to recombi nant FSH in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing AR T does not improve the ovarian response and even may have a negative impact on oocyte maturation and fertilization.