An. Gordon et al., Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan, J CL ONCOL, 19(14), 2001, pp. 3312-3322
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubi
cin (PLD) and topotecan in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma that
recurred after or didn't respond to first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy
.
Patients and Methods: patients with measurable and assessable disease were
randomized to receive either PLD 50 mg/m(2) as a 1-hour infusion every 4 we
eks or topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2)/d for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Patien
ts were stratified prospectively for platinum sensitivity and for the prese
nce or absence of bulky disease.
Results: A total of 474 patients were treated (239 PLD and 235 topotecan).
They comprised the intent-to-treat population. The overall progression-free
survival rates were similar between the two arms (P = .095). The overall r
esponse rates for PLD and topotecan were 19.7% and 17.0%, respectively (P =
.390). Median overall survival times were 60 weeks for PLD and 56.7 weeks
for topotecan. Data analyzed in platinum-sensitive patients demonstrated a
statistically significant benefit from PLD for progression-free survival (P
= .037), with medians of 28.9 for PLD versus 23.3 weeks for topotecan. For
overall survival, PLD was significantly superior to topotecan (P = .008),
with a median of 108 weeks versus 71.1 weeks. The platinum-refractory subgr
oup demonstrated a nonstatistically significant survival trend in favor of
topotecan (P = .455). Severe hematologic toxicity was more common with topo
tecan and was more likely to be associated with dosage modification, or gro
wth factor or blood product utilization.
Conclusion: The comparable efficacy, favorable safety profile, and convenie
nt dosing support the role of PLD as ct valuable treatment option in this p
atient population. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.