Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative preparative regimens: Impact of pretransplantation and posttransplantation factors on outcome
M. Michallet et al., Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative preparative regimens: Impact of pretransplantation and posttransplantation factors on outcome, J CL ONCOL, 19(14), 2001, pp. 3340-3349
Purpose: To analyze the impact of pre- and posttransplantation factors on t
he outcome of allogeneic transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditionin
g regimens.
patients and Methods: Ninety-two allogeneic transplantations after nonmyelo
ablative preparative regimens were reported to the Societe Francaise de Gre
ffe de Moelle Registry registry. Initial diagnoses were lymphoid diseases (
n = 22), myeloma (n = 14), acute leukemia and myelodysplasia (n = 41), chro
nic myelogenous leukemia (n = 12), and solid tumors (n = 3). Forty-six pati
ents had previously received a transplant, and 49 held progressive disease
before transplantation. Three types of conditioning regimens were used with
fludarabine or antithymocyte globulins. Eighty-nine patients underwent tra
nsplantation, 60 from peripheral-blood progenitor cells. Eighty-six patient
s received graft-versus-host disease (GHVD) prophylaxis for a median durati
on of 53 days.
Results: Seventy-nine patients engrafted, with 40 complete and 21 mixed chi
merisms. The acute GHVD rare at 3 months was 50% +/- 11%. Fifty-two patient
s achieved complete remission and 12, partial remission. At 18 months after
transplantation, the overall survival (OS) and the transplant-related mort
ality (TRM) were 32% +/- 12% and 38% +/- 14%, respectively. initial diagnos
is and disease status before transplantation significantly influenced survi
val. Age and GHVD prophylaxis type significantly influenced TRM. We also sh
owed an impact of GHVD, prophylaxis duration on OS and TRM. in multivariate
analysis, three factors remained of prognostic value on OS: initial diagno
sis, disease status at transplantation, and GHVD prophylaxis duration.
Conclusion: This series shows encouraging results from nonmyeloablative con
ditioning regimens before allotransplantation and demonstrates the impact o
f some pre- and posttransplantation factors on outcome after transplantatio
n. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.