Sentinel node investigation in breast cancer: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry

Citation
H. Torrenga et al., Sentinel node investigation in breast cancer: detailed analysis of the yield from step sectioning and immunohistochemistry, J CLIN PATH, 54(7), 2001, pp. 550-552
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
00219746 → ACNP
Volume
54
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
550 - 552
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9746(200107)54:7<550:SNIIBC>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Aims-To evaluate in detail the extent to which step sectioning and immunohi stochemical examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in patients with brea st cancer reveal additional node positive patients, to arrive at a sensitiv e yet workable protocol for histopathological SN examination. Methods-This study comprised 86 women with one or more positive SN after a successful SN procedure for clinical stage T1-T2 invasive breast cancer. SN s were lamellated into pieces of approximately 0.5 cm in size. One initial haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained central cross section was made for eac h block. When negative, four step ribbons were cut at intervals of 250 mum. One section from each ribbon was stained with H&E, and one was used for im munohistochemistry (IHC). Results-When taking the cumulative total of detected metastases at level 5 as 100%, the percentage of SN positive patients increased from 80%, 83%, 85 %, 87% to 88% in the H&E sections through levels I to 5, and with IHC these values were 86%, 90%, 94%, 98%, and 100%. Three of nine patients in whom m etastases were detected at levels 3-5 only had metastases in the subsequent axillary lymph node dissection. Conclusions-Multiple level sectioning of SNs (five levels at 250 mum interv als) and the use of IHC detects additional metastases up to the last level. Although more levels of sectioning might increase the yield even further, this protocol ensures a reasonable workload for the pathologist with an acc eptable sensitivity when compared with the published literature.