The role of income differences in explaining social inequalities in self rated health in Sweden and Britain

Citation
Ma. Yngwe et al., The role of income differences in explaining social inequalities in self rated health in Sweden and Britain, J EPIDEM C, 55(8), 2001, pp. 556-561
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
ISSN journal
0143005X → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
556 - 561
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-005X(200108)55:8<556:TROIDI>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Study objective-To analyse to what extent differences in income, using two distinct measures-as distribution across quintiles and poverty-explain soci al inequalities in self rated health, for men and women, in Sweden and Brit ain. Design-Series of cross sectional surveys, the Swedish Survey of Living Cond itions (ULF) and the British General Household Survey (GHS), during the per iod 1992-95. Participants and setting-Swedish and British men and women aged 25-64 years . Approximately 4000 Swedes and 12 500 Britons are interviewed each year in the cross sectional studies used. The sample contains 15 766 people in the Swedish dataset and 49 604 people in the British dataset. Main results-The magnitude of social inequalities in less than good self ra ted health was similar in Sweden and in Britain, but adjusting for income d ifferences explained a greater part of these in Britain than in Sweden. In Britain the distribution across income quintiles explained 47% of the socia l inequalities in self rated health among women and 31% among men, while in Sweden it explained, for women 13% and for men 20%. Poverty explained 22% for British women and 8% for British men of the social inequalities in self rated health, while in Sweden poverty explained much less (men 2.5% and wo men 0%). Conclusions-The magnitude of social inequalities in self rated health was s imilar in Sweden and in Britain. However, the distribution of income across occupational social classes explains a larger part of these inequalities i n Britain than in Sweden. One reason for this may be the differential expos ure to low income and poverty in the two countries.