Ivermectin has potent systemic activity against numerous species of nematod
es and arthropods, but there are some important species in these two groups
, such as the cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouche), that appear to be r
efractory to it. In an effort to determine if tire lack of systemic activit
y against C.felis is specific to ivermectin. or if it is a class-wide pheno
menon, 20 avermectin derivatives were tested in artificial membrane flea fe
eding system at concentrations of 20, 10, and 1 mug/ml. Results showed that
ivermectin had LC90 and LC50 values against fleas of 19.1 and 9.9 mug/ml,
respectively. Only four of the other 19 compounds evaluated possessed both
LC90 and LC,, values more potent than ivermectin and el en then the advanta
ge was modest. Among those four compounds was a two-fold increase in potenc
y relative to ivermectin when the LC90 values were considered (range, 9.2-1
0.3 mug/ml) and a two- to eight-fold increase when the LC50 values were exa
mined (range, 1.23-5.26 mug/ml). Neither the possession nor the number of o
leandrosyl sugars on the macrocyclic backbone were relevant for additional
flea activity because among these four compounds were two disaccharides, a
monosaccharide and an aglycone. Also. bond disposition between C-22 and 23
did not contribute to increase in activity because these molecules comprise
members with either single or double bonds. One of these avermectin analog
s was scaled-up and tested subcutaneously in a dog at > 100 times the comme
rcial ivermectin dosage and zero efficacy) was observed against the flea. W
e conclude that even the best in vitro avermectin does not have the in vivo
potential to become a commercial oral or subcutaneous nea treatment for co
mpanion animals.