J. Mccann et al., Radiological peer review of interval cancers in the East Anglian breast screening programme: what are we missing?, J MED SCREE, 8(2), 2001, pp. 77-85
Objective-To determine whether association between classification of interv
al cancers (false negative, minimal sign, true interval, occult) and tumour
characteristics can indicate areas for improvement in effectiveness of scr
eening
Setting-East Anglian regional Breast Screening Programme.
Method-The consensus classification of interval cases, obtained through pee
r review, was compared with tumour characteristics: size; grade; and nodal
status, and with radiological signs. A set of 923 cancers with known tumour
characteristics, presenting in unscreened women, was available for compari
son.
Result-In total, 385 interval cases were analysed. Prognosis of interval ca
ncers was at least as good as that of cancers in unscreened women, with few
er node positive cases. No significant relation was found between classific
ation of cases and age of patients. True intervals tended to present later
after a negative screen, although false negatives commonly presented earlie
r. Occult cancers were significantly smaller than false negatives. Analysis
of histological type yielded Little of relevance, and mammographic appeara
nce was similar in all classifications. At diagnosis, cancers in the low ri
sk group were more Likely to be seen as spiculate masses, whereas high risk
cases more often appeared as opacities. A higher proportion of interval ca
ses had been assessed than in the normal screened population.
Conclusion-Sensitivity may be improved by reducing false negative and minim
al sign cases (21% of interval cancers in East Anglia). These will include
tumours in all risk groups, and with all radiological features, thus no par
ticular age group or radiological feature may be targeted for improvement.
Misdiagnosis at assessment reduces sensitivity and therefore merits particu
lar study.